Iraq successfully
uses chemical, biological or nuclear weapons against U.S.
troops, Israel or even Turkey, Kuwait or Saudi Arabia. Kill
at several hundred Americans and the U.S. has said it would
retaliate with nukes. Unlikely, but depending on which way
the media runs, America could be seen as heroic or foolish
for being on the receiving end of this. Any Iraqi use of "weapons
of mass destruction" would not change the outcome of
the war. The U.S. is trying to avoid this situation by pointing
out that all Iraqis who have anything to do with the use of
these weapons against Americans would be hunted down and prosecuted.
In the Arab world, it is recognized that the Americans can
be very relentless, and successful, in this department. Iraq
still loses the war.
Terrorists, either Iraqi sponsored or doing it in the name
of "the Iraqi people" pull off another massive terrorist
attack and kill several hundred, or more, Americans. Again,
won't change the outcome of the war. Iraq still loses the
war.
Saddam convinces thousands of hard core supporters
to fight to the death. This causes all of them to die in particularly
messy ways, along with thousands of civilians who could not
get out of the way fast enough. Several hundred Americans
also die and large chunks of Baghdad get smashed. Iraq still
loses the war.
After the fighting begins, Saudi Arabia changes its mind and
closes it's airbases to American aircraft and stops shipping
oil. The latter is very unlikely, as Saudi Arabia is broke,
in debt and needs to sell lots of oil just to prevent a popular
uprising. Iraq still loses the war.
Civil war breaks out in Iraq between die hard Sunnis (Saddam's
power base), Shia militias (that have been maintaining training
camps in Iran) and Kurds. None of this would last long. The
invasion is largely to stomp on Saddam's Sunni backers and
that will happen no matter what. The Turks will take care
of any violent Kurds, something the Turks have been doing
quite handily for over a thousand years. The Shia militias
couldn't defeat the Republican Guard, and they certainly can't
defeat the U.S. Army. Iraq still loses the war.
After the fighting is over, the Iraqi people become angry
at the United States (for liberating them from Saddam?). Anyway,
widespread unrest attracts the international media which proceeds
to say unkind things about America. Saddam is not returned
to power.
The Palestinians redouble their terrorism efforts, and the
unrest spreads to Jordan (where Palestinians make up a majority
of the population.) Palestinians in Jordan attempt to over
throw the monarchy. Whether they succeed or not, Iraq still
loses the war.
Saddam's flunkies follow orders and set fire to many of Iraq's
oil fields and facilities. When this was done in Kuwait, the
fires were put out and the damage repaired within a year.
It cost nearly $6 billion, which was a lot less than many
expected. If the Iraqi oil fields burn, Iraq still loses,
and has plenty of oil revenue to pay for the repairs.
The Kurds try to advance south and take the Kirkuk and Mosul
oil fields. Turkey says no, and sends in troops. Kurds don't
stand a chance against Turks (never have.) Maybe the Turks
decide to keep northern Iraq. In any event, Iraq still loses
the war.
An Iraqi underground resistance develops after Saddam is defeated.
Iraqi guerillas fight on against American occupiers and their
Iraqi lackeys. America finds itself in another Vietnam. While
Iraqis have never, in their several thousand years of history,
operated like this, it is a worst, worst case. Iraq still
loses the war.
Submitted by, Elizabeth Charles
|