Already, the American
press is expressing its approval of the coverage of American
forces which the US military intends to allow its reporters
in the next Gulf war. The boys from CNN, CBS, ABC and The
New York Times will be "embedded" among the US marines
and infantry. The degree of censorship hasn't quite been worked
out. But it doesn't matter how much the Pentagon cuts from
the reporters' dispatches. A new CNN system of "script
approval" – the iniquitous instruction to reporters
that they have to send all their copy to anonymous officials
in Atlanta to ensure it is suitably sanitised – suggests
that the Pentagon and the Department of State have nothing
to worry about. Nor do the Israelis.
Indeed, reading a new CNN document, "Reminder
of Script Approval Policy", fairly takes the breath away.
"All reporters preparing package scripts must submit
the scripts for approval," it says. "Packages may
not be edited until the scripts are approved... All packages
originating outside Washington, LA (Los Angeles) or NY (New
York), including all international bureaus, must come to the
ROW in Atlanta for approval."
The date of this extraordinary message is 27
January. The "ROW" is the row of script editors
in Atlanta who can insist on changes or "balances"
in the reporter's dispatch. "A script is not approved
for air unless it is properly marked approved by an authorised
manager and duped (duplicated) to burcopy (bureau copy)...
When a script is updated it must be re-approved, preferably
by the originating approving authority."
Note the key words here: "approved"
and "authorised". CNN's man or woman in Kuwait or
Baghdad – or Jerusalem or Ramallah – may know
the background to his or her story; indeed, they will know
far more about it than the "authorities" in Atlanta.
But CNN's chiefs will decide the spin of the story.
CNN, of course, is not alone in this paranoid
form of reporting. Other US networks operate equally anti-journalistic
systems. And it's not the fault of the reporters. CNN's teams
may use clichés and don military costumes – you
will see them do this in the next war – but they try
to get something of the truth out. Next time, though, they're
going to have even less chance.
Just where this awful system leads is evident
from an intriguing exchange last year between CNN's reporter
in the occupied West Bank town of Ramallah, and Eason Jordan,
one of CNN's top honchos in Atlanta.
The journalist's first complaint was about a
story by the reporter Michael Holmes on the Red Crescent ambulance
drivers who are repeatedly shot at by Israeli troops. "We
risked our lives and went out with ambulance drivers... for
a whole day. We have also witnessed ambulances from our window
being shot at by Israeli soldiers... The story received approval
from Mike Shoulder. The story ran twice and then Rick Davis
(a CNN executive) killed it. The reason was we did not have
an Israeli army response, even though we stated in our story
that Israel believes that Palestinians are smuggling weapons
and wanted people in the ambulances."
The Israelis refused to give CNN an interview,
only a written statement. This statement was then written
into the CNN script. But again it was rejected by Davis in
Atlanta. Only when, after three days, the Israeli army gave
CNN an interview did Holmes's story run – but then with
the dishonest inclusion of a line that said the ambulances
were shot in "crossfire" (ie that Palestinians also
shot at their own ambulances).
The reporter's complaint was all too obvious.
"Since when do we hold a story hostage to the whims of
governments and armies? We were told by Rick that if we do
not get an Israeli on-camera we would not air the package.
This means that governments and armies are indirectly censoring
us and we are playing directly into their own hands."
The relevance of this is all too obvious in
the next Gulf War. We are going to have to see a US army officer
denying everything the Iraqis say if any report from Iraq
is to get on air. Take another of the Ramallah correspondent's
complaints last year. In a package on the damage to Ramallah
after Israel's massive incursion last April, "we had
already mentioned right at the top of our piece that Israel
says it is doing all these incursions because it wants to
crack down on the infrastructure of terror. However, obviously
that was not enough. We were made by the ROW (in Atlanta)
to repeat this same idea three times in one piece, just to
make sure that we keep justifying the Israeli actions..."
But the system of "script approval"
that has so marred CNN's coverage has got worse. In a further
and even more sinister message dated 31 January this year,
CNN staff are told that a new computerised system of script
approval will allow "authorised script approvers to mark
scripts (ie reports) in a clear and standard manner. Script
EPs (executive producers) will click on the coloured APPROVED
button to turn it from red (unapproved) to green (approved).
When someone makes a change in the script after approval,
the button will turn yellow." Someone? Who is this someone?
CNN's reporters aren't told.
But when we recall that CNN revealed after the
1991 Gulf War that it had allowed Pentagon "trainees"
into the CNN newsroom in Atlanta, I have my suspicions.
Submitted by, Madison Daniel
|